The Falkville Metal Man: A Critical Analysis of the 1973 Greenhaw UFO Encounter

---

The Greenhaw encounter of 1973, widely known as the “Falkville Metal Man” incident, stands as one of the most intriguing and visually documented alleged extraterrestrial encounters in American UFO history. On October 17, 1973, Jeff Greenhaw, then the Police Chief of Falkville, Alabama, claimed to have encountered and photographed a humanoid figure in a metallic, reflective suit following an anonymous report of a UFO landing. This incident, occurring during a significant wave of UFO sightings across the United States known as the “1973 UFO Flap,” has remained a compelling but controversial case in UFO literature for nearly five decades.

Historical Context and Incident Timeline

The 1973 UFO Wave

The Greenhaw encounter took place during a significant period of UFO activity in the United States. The fall of 1973 witnessed numerous reports of UFO sightings and alleged alien encounters across the country, particularly in the Southeastern United States¹. This period, referred to as the “1973 UFO Flap” by researchers, was characterized by a high volume of reported sightings, many involving humanoid entities. Public interest in UFO phenomena was at a high point, influenced by media coverage and popular culture depictions of extraterrestrial visitation.

The Initial Call and Investigation

According to multiple accounts, the sequence of events began when Jeff Greenhaw, the 23-year-old Police Chief of Falkville, Alabama, received an anonymous phone call at approximately 10:00 PM on October 17, 1973²¹. The female caller, described as “almost hysterical,” reported that an unidentified flying object had landed in a field on the outskirts of town, specifically on property owned by Bobby Summerford²³.

Despite being off duty and at home with his wife, Greenhaw decided to investigate the report. Before leaving, he gathered his service equipment including his keys, handcuffs, and revolver, as well as his Polaroid camera, which he brought as an afterthought in case there was something worth documenting².

Upon arriving at the reported landing site, Greenhaw conducted an initial search of the field but found nothing unusual²¹. He then decided to drive around the perimeter of the property before heading home. While traveling down a narrow gravel road adjacent to the field, Greenhaw encountered what he described as a humanoid figure standing in the middle of the road, approximately 75 feet ahead of his vehicle²¹⁴.

The Encounter

Greenhaw initially assumed the figure was a human, possibly the property owner investigating the disturbance¹. He exited his vehicle and approached the entity, calling out to it, but received no response⁵. As he got within about 15 feet of the figure, illuminated by his patrol car’s headlights, Greenhaw realized the entity was unusual².

The Police Chief described the entity as standing approximately 6 feet tall, completely covered in what appeared to be a reflective metallic suit that resembled aluminum foil⁵¹³. The suit seemed to be a single piece of material with no visible seams, including where the neck met the head¹. He noted that the surface was extremely reflective, stating: “It looked like his head and neck were kind of made together. He was real bright, something like rubbing mercury on nickel, but just as smooth as glass. Different angles give different lighting”⁵¹.

Some reports indicate the entity may have had an antenna-like protrusion on top of its head¹, though this detail isn’t consistent across all accounts. Greenhaw also observed that the figure moved in an unusual, robotic manner that reminded him of the robot from the television show “Lost in Space”⁵³.

The Photographs and Chase

Realizing the unusual nature of what he was witnessing, Greenhaw retrieved his Polaroid camera from his vehicle and managed to take four photographs of the entity²⁵³. The flash from the camera appeared to startle the figure, which then began to move away⁵.

The entity’s movement was described as unusually fast and mechanical, with Greenhaw stating it moved as if it had “springs on its feet or something”⁵. Greenhaw attempted to pursue the entity in his patrol car, deciding to “chase it down, and, if I have to, run over it”⁵. However, he was unable to keep up with the figure, which soon disappeared into the darkness⁵³.

Aftermath and Consequences

Immediate Reactions and Publication

Greenhaw reported the incident and shared his photographs, which quickly became public. The encounter and the images received significant local attention, earning the entity the nickname “Metal Man” or “Falkville Metal Man”³⁴.

According to sources, Greenhaw faced significant ridicule and hostility from the local community following his report³. In an interview with Red Water Filmworks decades later, Greenhaw reflected on his initial thoughts during the encounter: “My initial thoughts were maybe aluminum foil but there were no pieces around there after it was all over. I don’t know what to believe at that point”³.

Personal and Professional Impact

The consequences for Greenhaw were severe and long-lasting. He resigned from his position as Police Chief within weeks of the incident³. More seriously, on November 9, 1973, approximately three weeks after the encounter, Greenhaw’s mobile home reportedly caught fire under suspicious circumstances². While not definitively linked to his UFO report, the timing has led many researchers to speculate about a possible connection.

Further adding to the mysterious aftermath, reports suggest that approximately ten years after the incident, Greenhaw’s home was broken into, and the original Polaroid photographs, along with his service revolver and shotgun from the night of the encounter, were stolen⁵. This alleged theft has prevented modern analysis of what would have been crucial physical evidence.

The personal toll on Greenhaw appears to have been significant. In subsequent years, he rarely gave interviews about the incident, suggesting a reluctance to revisit an experience that had dramatically altered his life course³.

Credibility Assessment

Greenhaw as a Witness

Jeff Greenhaw’s credibility as the primary witness in this case presents several considerations:

Factors supporting credibility:

1. As Police Chief, Greenhaw was a trained observer with professional responsibility for accurate reporting³⁴.
2. He had little apparent motive to fabricate such an encounter, especially considering the negative consequences it had on his career and standing in the community³.
3. He maintained consistency in his basic account over the years, despite rarely discussing the incident publicly³.
4. He took the initiative to document the encounter with photographs, suggesting he was thinking clearly enough to gather evidence²⁵³.

Factors complicating credibility assessment:

1. There were no corroborating witnesses to the encounter itself.
2. The anonymous caller who reported the UFO landing was never identified, raising questions about the initial premise for Greenhaw’s investigation²⁵.
3. The original photographs are no longer available for modern analysis due to their reported theft⁵.
4. Greenhaw was relatively young (23) and inexperienced as Police Chief at the time of the incident³.

The Photographic Evidence

The Polaroid photographs taken by Greenhaw constitute the primary physical evidence in this case. Based on descriptions and reproductions, the photos showed a humanoid figure in a reflective suit, standing on what appears to be a dirt road⁵¹³.

Analysis of the available copies of the images has yielded mixed conclusions:

1. The reflective nature of the suit makes details difficult to discern, creating both a distinctive appearance but also limiting detailed analysis.
2. The images show a generally humanoid shape and stature consistent with Greenhaw’s description.
3. The quality and limitations of 1970s Polaroid technology affect the evidentiary value of the images.

Without access to the original photographs for modern forensic analysis, definitive conclusions about what they depict remain elusive. The copies that exist in UFO literature and online are several generations removed from the originals, further complicating analysis.

Contextual Credibility

The timing of the Greenhaw encounter within the 1973 UFO flap provides both supporting and complicating context:

1. Supporting context: The incident occurred during a documented period of increased UFO sighting reports across the region, suggesting a possible connection to broader phenomena¹.
2. Complicating context: The high public interest in UFOs during this period could have influenced perceptions and reporting, potentially leading to misidentifications or heightened suggestibility⁶.

Alternative Explanations and Skeptical Perspectives

Hoax Hypotheses

Skeptical investigators have proposed several hoax scenarios to explain the Greenhaw encounter:

1. Deliberate fabrication: Some suggest Greenhaw may have staged the encounter, perhaps using an accomplice in a costume. Motivations suggested include seeking attention or creating a local sensation.
2. Prank victim: Another theory proposes that Greenhaw himself may have been the victim of a prank by local residents who created the “Metal Man” to fool the young police chief.

The lack of clear motive for Greenhaw to perpetrate a hoax, especially given the negative consequences to his career and reputation, weighs against the first hypothesis. However, the second scenario remains plausible, especially considering the anonymous phone call that initiated the incident.

Misidentification Possibilities

Several misidentification explanations have been proposed:

1. Costume or protective gear: The reflective suit could have been specialized firefighting equipment, an early hazmat suit, or even a homemade costume using aluminum foil or other reflective material.
2. NASA connection: Some have speculated that the figure might have been connected to nearby NASA facilities in Huntsville, Alabama, potentially testing protective gear or equipment.
3. Industrial worker: Another explanation suggests it could have been a worker in specialized protective equipment from local industry who was in the area for legitimate reasons.

The unusual movement described by Greenhaw remains difficult to explain through misidentification, though fear and unusual lighting conditions could have affected his perception of how the figure moved.

Psychological Factors

Some skeptics suggest psychological factors may have influenced Greenhaw’s experience:

1. Suggestion and expectation: The anonymous call about a UFO landing may have primed Greenhaw to interpret an unusual but mundane sight in extraordinary terms.
2. Stress and isolation: Encountering an unusual figure alone at night could have triggered stress responses affecting perception and memory.

However, the presence of photographic evidence suggests Greenhaw did encounter something physically present, even if its nature remains disputed.

Cultural Impact and Historical Significance

Place in UFO Literature

The Falkville Metal Man has become a notable case in UFO literature for several reasons:

1. Visual evidence: The existence of photographs, even if no longer available in original form, places this case among a relatively small subset of UFO encounters with contemporaneous visual documentation.
2. Law enforcement witness: Greenhaw’s position as Police Chief lends the case a level of credibility not present in many civilian reports.
3. Distinctive entity: The “Metal Man” description created a memorable and distinctive entity type within alien encounter taxonomy.

The case is frequently mentioned in compilations of significant UFO encounters, particularly those involving humanoid entities, and is considered one of the most notable cases from the 1973 wave.

Local and Broader Impact

The Falkville Metal Man has achieved notable cultural recognition:

1. Local legend: In northern Alabama, the Metal Man has become part of regional folklore and local legend³⁴.
2. Media coverage: The case has been featured in various documentaries, podcasts, and publications about UFO phenomena⁷³.
3. Comparative significance: The case is often discussed alongside other significant entity encounters from the same period, such as the Pascagoula incident, which also occurred in 1973¹.

The endurance of the Falkville Metal Man in UFO discourse demonstrates how compelling visual evidence, combined with a credible witness, can establish a case’s place in the cultural memory regardless of whether a definitive explanation is reached.

Research Gaps and Future Directions

Several significant gaps in the evidence warrant further research:

1. The anonymous caller: The identity and motivations of the person who initially reported the UFO landing remain unknown. Locating this individual would provide crucial context for understanding how the encounter began.
2. Missing photographs: The reported theft of the original Polaroid images approximately ten years after the incident has prevented modern analysis of this key evidence. Any efforts to locate copies or the originals would be valuable.
3. Fire investigation: More information about the investigation into the fire that destroyed Greenhaw’s home shortly after the incident could help determine if there was any connection to his report.
4. Contemporary witnesses: Identification of other community members who may have interacted with Greenhaw immediately following the incident could provide additional perspectives on his demeanor and the initial reception of his report.
5. Regional context: Further research into other UFO or unusual entity reports from the same geographic area during this period could establish whether the Metal Man was unique or part of a pattern.

Contemporary Relevance

The Greenhaw encounter takes on new relevance in light of recent developments in UFO/UAP research and government disclosure. Since 2017, there has been increased government acknowledgment of unexplained aerial phenomena, culminating in Congressional hearings and the establishment of formal investigation offices⁸⁹.

In this context, the testimony of David Grusch, a former intelligence official and whistleblower, that the U.S. government has been concealing information about non-human intelligence and recovered craft⁸⁹, adds a new dimension to historical cases like Greenhaw’s. While there is no direct connection between Grusch’s claims and the Falkville incident, the broader implications of potential government knowledge of non-human entities gives historical encounters renewed significance.

The question becomes whether incidents like the Falkville Metal Man might represent early, public encounters with phenomena that government agencies were simultaneously investigating privately. Without further disclosure, such connections remain speculative, but the parallels between civilian reports and alleged classified information raise important questions about the historical continuity of these phenomena.

Conclusion

The 1973 Greenhaw encounter represents an unresolved case with elements that resist simple explanation. While hoax, misidentification, and psychological explanations all offer possible interpretations, none fully accounts for all aspects of the reported experience and its aftermath.

Jeff Greenhaw’s position as a law enforcement officer, the existence of photographic evidence (albeit no longer available for analysis), and the personal cost he appears to have paid for making his report lend weight to the possibility that he genuinely encountered something unusual. However, the nature of that encounter—whether extraterrestrial, terrestrial but unusual, or mundane but misperceived—remains open to interpretation.

What is clear is that the Falkville Metal Man incident has secured a place in UFO lore as one of the more distinctive humanoid encounter reports of the 1970s. Its impact on Greenhaw’s life and its persistence in regional folklore and UFO literature demonstrate the powerful hold such experiences can have on both personal lives and cultural memory.

Until further evidence emerges, particularly regarding the original photographic evidence or the identity of the anonymous caller, the Greenhaw encounter will likely remain in the category of UFO cases that continue to intrigue but resist definitive explanation. As one researcher aptly summarized: “After that, things were just so strange. This wasn’t real. It wasn’t really happening, but it was happening to me. Why me?”³—a question that encapsulates the personal impact and enduring mystery of one of America’s most distinctive close encounter cases.

Sources and Further Research

For those interested in further investigation of the Greenhaw case, several avenues of research remain open. The National Archives in the UK maintains extensive records of UFO reports, though these focus primarily on British cases⁶. The FBI’s Vault also contains declassified UFO investigation records that might provide contextual information about government approaches to such reports during the 1970s¹⁰.

Local historical societies and newspaper archives in northern Alabama might yield additional contemporaneous accounts and reactions to the incident. Additionally, efforts to locate any surviving copies of the original photographs or to identify and interview the anonymous caller would significantly advance understanding of this case.

As government disclosure about UAPs continues to evolve, cases like the Greenhaw encounter may warrant reexamination in light of new information about official knowledge and investigations of unusual aerial and entity phenomena. Whether the Falkville Metal Man will eventually find explanation or remain an enduring mystery depends largely on the emergence of new evidence and the continued efforts of dedicated researchers.

⁂

^{25187111296341314151016171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758}

1. https://www.pararational.com/falkville-metal-man/ ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵ ↩⁶ ↩⁷ ↩⁸ ↩⁹ ↩¹⁰ ↩¹¹ ↩¹² ↩¹³

2. https://www.xaluannews.com/modules.php?name=News\&file=article\&sid=3312874 ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵ ↩⁶ ↩⁷ ↩⁸ ↩⁹ ↩¹⁰ ↩¹¹

3. https://www.cullmantribune.com/2021/07/10/do-you-believe-in-the-metal-man/ ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵ ↩⁶ ↩⁷ ↩⁸ ↩⁹ ↩¹⁰ ↩¹¹ ↩¹² ↩¹³ ↩¹⁴ ↩¹⁵ ↩¹⁶ ↩¹⁷ ↩¹⁸ ↩¹⁹ ↩²⁰

4. https://www.patrickgaido.com/post/the-metal-man-of-falkville-the-bizarre-encounter-that-became-an-urban-legend ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵

5. http://strangeco.blogspot.com/2025/01/jeff-and-metal-man.html ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵ ↩⁶ ↩⁷ ↩⁸ ↩⁹ ↩¹⁰ ↩¹¹ ↩¹² ↩¹³ ↩¹⁴ ↩¹⁵

6. https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/help-with-your-research/research-guides/ufos/ ↩ ↩² ↩³

7. https://cryptonautpodcast.com/podcast-episodes/18-falkville-metal-man/ ↩ ↩²

8. https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/4358286-ufo-whistleblower-doubles-down-on-claims-this-is-a-nightmare-for-me/ ↩ ↩² ↩³

9. https://www.twz.com/ufo-whistleblower-claims-massive-coverup-retribution-in-sworn-testimony ↩ ↩² ↩³

10. https://vault.fbi.gov/UFO ↩ ↩²

11. https://ia601405.us.archive.org/28/items/B-001-014-055/B-001-014-055.pdf ↩

12. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronology_of_Provisional_Irish_Republican_Army_actions_(1970–1979) ↩

13. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/sce.21855 ↩

14. https://documents.theblackvault.com/documents/ufos/UK/defe-24-2048-1-1.pdf ↩

15. https://cain.ulster.ac.uk/othelem/chron/ch74.htm ↩

16. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Grusch_UFO_whistleblower_claims ↩

17. http://www.theironskeptic.com/articles/greenhaw/greenhaw.htm ↩

18. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cGYG-FS32VM ↩

19. http://www.chronline.com/stories/aliens-invade-chehalis-for-annual-flying-saucer-party,361887 ↩

20. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8553227/ ↩

21. https://www.forbes.com/sites/danidiplacido/2023/06/13/claims-made-by-ufo-whistleblower-david-grusch-are-pure-science-fiction/ ↩

22. http://strangeco.blogspot.com/2020/12/newspaper-clipping-of-day_9.html ↩

23. https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/407-the-mystery-of-the-metal-man/id1236963001?i=1000695663684 ↩

24. https://www.reddit.com/r/UrbanMyths/comments/1gzkahb/the_metal_man_of_falkville_in_1973_jeff_greenhaw/ ↩

25. https://www.kent.ac.uk/school-of-psychology/people/221/douglas-karen ↩

26. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/world-us-canada-66320192 ↩

27. https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP81R00560R000100010012-8.pdf ↩

28. https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP81R00560R000100010010-0.pdf ↩

29. https://open.spotify.com/episode/12PKyVXdwfvXrlMENQx3aW ↩

30. https://vault.fbi.gov/UFO/UFO Part 01/view ↩

31. https://oklahoma.gov/content/dam/ok/en/ddco/documents/meeting-packets/fy-24-mtg-packets/january-2024/state-plan-mtg-materials-1.4.2024.pdf ↩

32. https://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2021-06-30/debates/C3B3E127-A168-4315-A1C9-B4D7CC80895D/UnidentifiedFlyingObjects ↩

33. https://www.reddit.com/r/Humanoidencounters/comments/lfp2z8/the_metal_man_of_falkville_in_1973_jeff_greenhaw/ ↩

34. https://www.reddit.com/r/futurama/comments/npf8at/in_1973_and_alabama_police_officer_responded_to/ ↩

35. https://content.next.westlaw.com/Document/I72eef97e928511d9a707f4371c9c34f0/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default\&contextData=(sc.Default) ↩

36. https://www.metaphysicalarticles.org/2020/08/detailed-report-of-jeff-greenhaws.html ↩

37. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2V3ViH1Se4 ↩

38. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2bX2MJyakgE ↩

39. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8LtysoBU1G0 ↩

40. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4CODFhKOqqA ↩

41. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wg5NbZI3qFs ↩

42. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0SfwgKHylE ↩

43. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=127_zN40nIM ↩

44. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cphe8d5xnPA ↩

45. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6WMX41AqIdk ↩

46. https://www.washingtonpost.com/style/of-interest/2023/10/05/ufo-david-grusch-uap-congress-yes-theory/ ↩

47. https://www.bitchute.com/video/0T0VwfsByfnD/ ↩

48. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ufo-reports-in-the-uk ↩

49. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/world-us-canada-66307705 ↩

50. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6CWSFUnOFZU ↩

51. https://www.reddit.com/r/HighStrangeness/comments/e8aq57/jeff_greenhaw_the_officer_who_snapped_a_photo_of/ ↩

52. https://theconversation.com/whistleblower-calls-for-government-transparency-as-congress-digs-for-the-truth-about-ufos-210435 ↩

53. https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vjtl/ ↩

54. https://apps.cityofmesquite.com/city_secweb/records/councilweb/030303m.pdf ↩

55. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7398108.stm ↩

56. https://www.npr.org/2023/07/27/1190390376/ufo-hearing-non-human-biologics-uaps ↩

57. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rendlesham_Forest_incident ↩

58. https://www.wales.com/news/united-kingdom/netflix-premieres-ufo-documentary-featuring-wales ↩