Isaac Koi

This website was the first generated by my self-improving AI system (Skynet), to summarise the top 100 UFO cases.

In the annals of UFO encounters, few cases blend the mundane and the extraordinary quite like the 1961 Eagle River incident. When a rural Wisconsin farmer claimed to receive pancakes from extraterrestrial visitors, it created a unique chapter in UFO history that continues to perplex researchers today. This case represents a fascinating intersection of physical evidence, government investigation, and cultural impact that deserves thorough examination.

Historical and Factual Background

On the morning of April 18, 1961, at approximately 11:00 AM, 54-year-old Joe Simonton was going about his ordinary routine at his chicken farm located about four miles west of Eagle River, Wisconsin. Simonton, who worked as a plumber and handyman in addition to farming, was alone that day as his wife was away in Chicago working at a department store1. While washing dishes in his kitchen, Simonton heard an unusual sound outside his rural home21.

Upon investigating, Simonton witnessed what he described as a metallic, disc-shaped object hovering above his property before landing in his yard. He characterized the craft as “brighter than chrome” and resembling two large soup bowls or washbowls placed together21. According to Simonton’s account, a hatch opened in the craft, revealing three humanoid occupants inside34.

Simonton described these beings as short, “swarthy” men who looked “Italian” with very penetrating eyes45. In a particularly notable detail, Simonton claimed he couldn’t maintain eye contact with the leader because his eyes were “so penetrating”5. Communication appeared to be non-verbal, as Simonton reported no speech between himself and the visitors6.

The encounter took an unusual turn when one of the beings presented Simonton with a container resembling a jug or bucket, which Simonton understood as a request for water. He filled the container from a nearby pump and returned it to the entities4. Upon looking inside the craft, Simonton claimed to see a dark interior “the color of black wrought iron” containing instrument panels and emitting a slow whining sound similar to the hum of a generator6.

Inside the craft, Simonton observed one of the occupants cooking on what he described as a “flameless grill”36. The being appeared to be preparing small, pancake-like food items. When Simonton showed interest in the food, one of the occupants, dressed in black clothing with a narrow red trim along the trousers, handed him four small, flat cakes with tiny holes in them346.

The entire encounter reportedly lasted about five minutes before the beings closed their hatch – which Simonton noted was so perfectly fitted that he “could scarcely detect where the hatch was” when closed6. The craft then took off quickly, heading south at a 45-degree angle. Simonton described a blast of air that bowed nearby pine trees as the craft departed6. In his own colorful words, “There I stood in the driveway with a handful of greasy pancakes and my mouth open, wondering what the heck I’d saw”5.

Interestingly, Simonton’s encounter may have had a corroborating witness. An insurance agent named Savino Borgo was reportedly driving near Simonton’s farm at the time and also claimed to have seen a flying saucer in the area4.

The Eagle River UFO Encounter (1961): A Critical Analysis of the Simonton Pancake Case - Full-Text (SVG)

Physical Evidence and Official Investigation

What distinguishes the Eagle River incident from many other UFO reports is the presence of physical evidence – the pancakes that Simonton received. According to multiple sources, Simonton tasted one of the cakes but was unimpressed, describing it as tasting “like cardboard”42.

The remaining three pancakes were distributed for analysis:

  1. One pancake was given to a local judge (Franklin Carter)
  2. One was given to Dr. J. Allen Hynek of Project Blue Book
  3. One was provided to the Food and Drug Administration via the Air Force4

The U.S. Air Force, through its Project Blue Book UFO investigation program, took an interest in the case. Project Blue Book Director Robert Friend decided the Air Force should investigate, partly due to concerns that the National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena (NICAP) might use the case to criticize the Air Force’s handling of UFO reports7.

After laboratory analysis, the pancakes were found to be made entirely of earthly ingredients4. Despite the mundane composition of the pancakes, the Air Force classified the case as “unexplained” in their official files2. This classification is significant as only a small percentage of the thousands of cases investigated by Project Blue Book received this designation.

Credibility Assessment

The credibility of the Eagle River encounter hinges largely on the reliability of Joe Simonton as a witness. Multiple sources indicate that Simonton was well-regarded in his community. He first reported his experience to his friend, Vilas County Judge Franklin Carter, who was known to have an interest in UFO phenomena7. Judge Carter vouched for Simonton’s honesty and reliability4.

Dr. J. Allen Hynek, the scientific consultant to Project Blue Book, met with Simonton as part of the official investigation. In his report, Hynek noted that he was impressed by Simonton’s behavior and sincerity. Hynek wrote that Simonton knew investigators would likely not believe his story, but Simonton maintained that he was simply reporting what he had experienced4.

French UFO researcher Jacques Vallee also investigated the case and, like Hynek, was struck by Simonton’s sincerity and the detailed manner in which he recounted his experience8. Vallee noted that Simonton’s descriptions of the craft aligned with details from other close encounter cases he had researched8.

Several factors lend credence to Simonton’s account:

  1. Lack of motivation for fabrication: Simonton had no apparent financial or fame-seeking motivation. In fact, he later expressed regret about coming forward, telling a United Press International reporter two weeks after the incident, “if it happened again, I don’t think I’d tell anybody about it”49.
  2. Consistency: By all accounts, Simonton remained consistent in his story over time, despite significant public ridicule89.
  3. Local support: People who had known Simonton for years believed his account, suggesting his prior reputation was that of a reliable, truthful individual4.
  4. Physical evidence: While the analysis of the pancakes didn’t reveal extraterrestrial origins, the presence of physical objects sets this case apart from many UFO claims42.
  5. Corroborating witness: The reported sighting by Savino Borgo of a flying saucer in the vicinity at approximately the same time provides potential secondary confirmation4.

Counterarguments and Skepticism

Despite these factors supporting Simonton’s credibility, the case has faced significant skepticism:

The Air Force ultimately concluded that Simonton had likely experienced a hallucination or dream that he mistook for reality4. This explanation, however, doesn’t account for the physical pancakes, unless Simonton had prepared them himself.

The bizarre nature of the story, particularly the mundane exchange of water for pancakes, has invited ridicule. Shortly after the incident, the story “turned from an interesting UFO encounter into a nationwide joke” with newspapers covering it in a “derisive tone”4. Critics might reasonably ask why advanced beings capable of interstellar travel would be interested in exchanging pancakes with a Wisconsin farmer.

Psychological explanations have been proposed, suggesting Simonton may have experienced a vivid hallucination, sleep paralysis, or some other altered state of consciousness. The Air Force’s conclusion leans toward this explanation4.

The lack of additional direct witnesses to the encounter itself, despite the presence of physical evidence, leaves room for alternative explanations. While Savino Borgo reportedly saw a UFO in the area, there’s no indication he witnessed the landing or interaction4.

The composition of the pancakes – made from earthly ingredients – suggests a terrestrial origin, though believers might counter that aliens could have been using local materials or replicating Earth food.

The Eagle River UFO Encounter (1961): A Critical Analysis of the Simonton Pancake Case - P1 (SVG)

Broader Context and Regional Patterns

Interestingly, the Eagle River encounter wasn’t an isolated incident in the region. According to some sources, the area experienced numerous UFO sightings between 1959 and 19634. Additionally, several unusual events occurred in temporal proximity to Simonton’s encounter:

  1. Nine days after Simonton’s experience, on April 27, 1961, six people in Rhinelander, Wisconsin (about 12 miles east of Eagle River) reported seeing a silver-shaped craft8.
  2. The area suffered a power failure and telephone outage in the month following the incident4.
  3. A B-47 bomber crashed approximately 60 miles from Eagle River on February 24, 1961, and another plane crashed near the area on May 2, with the pilot reporting a strange sensation of “weightlessness” just before the crash4.

While these events may be coincidental, they provide interesting contextual background to Simonton’s claim.

Influence and Impact

The Eagle River pancake incident has had a lasting impact on UFO discourse and popular culture:

Unique encounter type: The case represents an unusual type of close encounter involving non-threatening interaction and an exchange of items, setting it apart from more common sighting reports or abduction narratives35.

Official investigation: As one of the cases officially investigated by Project Blue Book and classified as “unexplained,” it holds a notable place in government UFO research history2.

Cultural reference point: The case has become a staple in UFO literature and media, appearing in numerous books, articles, and documentaries. It was featured in the History Channel series “Ancient Aliens” in an episode titled “Food of the Gods”2.

Exemplar of contactee experiences: The case has been cited as an example of the more benign “contactee” experiences that were reported particularly during the 1950s and 1960s15.

Emblematic of rural UFO encounters: The Eagle River incident exemplifies a particular type of UFO encounter narrative common in rural America during the Cold War era, characterized by isolated settings and ordinary people having extraordinary experiences5.

The case is referenced by respected researchers like Jacques Vallee in his influential book “Passport to Magonia”10, indicating its significance within serious UFO research. UFO researcher J. Allen Hynek’s involvement also lends the case historical significance.

Legacy and Contemporary Relevance

Over sixty years later, the Eagle River incident continues to fascinate researchers and the public. The combination of physical evidence, government investigation, and the witness’s apparent sincerity makes it a standout case despite its bizarre details.

Modern researchers continue to discuss and investigate aspects of the case. For example, a recent episode of the “Haunted Objects Podcast” claimed to have tracked down missing evidence related to the pancakes that Simonton received10. This ongoing interest demonstrates the case’s enduring relevance in UFO discourse.

The Eagle River incident also represents an important historical marker in the evolution of UFO reports. It emerged during a period when contact narratives were shifting from the friendly “Space Brother” encounters of the 1950s toward the more ominous abduction reports that would dominate later decades15.

Critical Assessment and Lingering Questions

From a critical perspective, several aspects of the Eagle River case remain unresolved:

  1. The pancakes: What happened to all three pancakes that were distributed for analysis? While analysis reportedly found them to be made of terrestrial ingredients, the complete analytical results and chain of custody deserve further investigation10.
  2. Psychological state: Was Simonton evaluated by mental health professionals? Could his experience be explained by known psychological phenomena?
  3. Additional witnesses: Was Savino Borgo’s sighting investigated thoroughly, and were there other potential witnesses in the area who might have seen something unusual that day?
  4. Contextual events: What, if any, connection exists between Simonton’s encounter and the other unusual events reported in the region during that period?
  5. Hypnosis: Some sources suggest Simonton may have undergone hypnosis as part of the investigation10. What, if anything, emerged from these sessions?

Suggestions for Follow-up Research

For those interested in further investigating this case, several avenues of research could prove fruitful:

  1. FOIA requests: Comprehensive Freedom of Information Act requests for complete Project Blue Book files on this case, including any material that may have been classified or separated from the main case file.
  2. Scientific reanalysis: Modern scientific analysis of any remaining physical evidence, if it could be located, using contemporary techniques not available in 1961.
  3. Local newspaper archives: A thorough review of the Eagle River area newspapers from 1959-1963 could reveal additional context and possibly other witnesses or related phenomena.
  4. Family interviews: Locating and interviewing any living relatives of Simonton, Judge Carter, or other key figures might uncover additional details or family lore about the incident.
  5. Comparative analysis: A detailed comparison with similar “food exchange” cases in UFO literature could reveal patterns that might illuminate the Eagle River incident.

The Eagle River UFO Encounter (1961): A Critical Analysis of the Simonton Pancake Case - P2 (SVG)

Conclusion

The 1961 Eagle River UFO encounter represents a fascinating case study in the UFO phenomenon. It contains elements that both support and challenge its authenticity. Joe Simonton appears to have been a credible witness with no obvious motivation to fabricate such a story, especially given the ridicule he faced. The physical evidence of the pancakes, while determined to be of earthly origin, adds an unusual dimension to the case that few UFO reports can match.

Whether one views the Eagle River incident as evidence of extraterrestrial contact, a psychological experience, or an elaborate hoax, its place in UFO history is secure. It exemplifies the personal, often bizarre nature of close encounter reports that emerged during the Cold War era in rural America.

The case remains officially “unexplained” – a designation that perhaps best captures its enduring mystery. Like the pancakes themselves, the Eagle River encounter offers something tangible to examine, yet its ultimate nature remains just beyond our full understanding.

For video coverage of this fascinating case, including rare footage of Joe Simonton discussing his experience, see this original news report in HD quality11.

⁂

37421869101151213141516171819

  1. https://hardcorezen.info/alien-pancakes/7894 ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6

  2. https://www.cultofweird.com/ufo-sightings/wisconsin-alien-pancakes/ ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7 ↩8

  3. https://www.onlyinyourstate.com/experiences/wisconsin/ufo-sighting-wi ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  4. https://journalnews.com.ph/bizarre-ufo-encounter-of-us-farmer-three-aliens-gave-him-pancakes/ ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7 ↩8 ↩9 ↩10 ↩11 ↩12 ↩13 ↩14 ↩15 ↩16 ↩17 ↩18 ↩19 ↩20 ↩21 ↩22

  5. https://harpers.org/archive/2023/11/the-abduction-of-betty-and-barney-hill-bowman/ ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7 ↩8

  6. https://cufos.org/PDFs/IUR issues/IUR Vol. 21 No. 1 Spring 1996.pdf ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7

  7. https://podcastufo.com/tag/joe-simonton/ ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  8. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FbXc7Uh8mto ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  9. https://dekedickerson.com/musings/joe-simonton-and-the-alien-pancakes/ ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  10. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MaKZPy9NPYk ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  11. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D46whiWeL7A ↩ ↩2

  12. https://shows.acast.com/within-the-mist/episodes/eagle-river-ufo-encounter ↩

  13. https://www.reddit.com/r/StrangeEarth/comments/14raafw/joe_simontons_grey_alien_encounter_who_said_he/ ↩

  14. https://www.criticalpast.com/video/65675039958_Joe-Simonton_flying-saucer_civilian-Joes-experience-to-meet-an-alien_ufo ↩

  15. https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOB/comments/yqy18s/joe_simontons_grey_alien_encounter_who_said_he/ ↩

  16. https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.135.3503.518.a ↩

  17. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_U.F.O. ↩

  18. https://kirkcenter.org/reviews/making-a-home-among-monsters-and-martians/ ↩

  19. https://www.wuwm.com/2021-10-26/four-notable-ufo-sightings-in-wisconsin-to-learn-about ↩