Claude Vorilhon’s 1973 Alien Encounter: Origins of the Raëlian Movement

---

Before examining the evidence surrounding Claude Vorilhon’s claimed extraterrestrial encounter in 1973, it is important to note that this case represents one of the most consequential claimed alien contacts in recent history - not because of government verification or physical evidence, but because it launched an international religious movement that continues today. The encounter serves as the foundational myth for the Raëlian religion, which has attracted tens of thousands of followers worldwide and generated significant controversy, particularly around human cloning claims in the early 2000s.

Historical and Factual Background

Vorilhon Before the Encounter

Claude Vorilhon was born in France in 1946 and raised in the small town of Ambert in central France. Before his alleged alien encounter, Vorilhon had pursued various careers. He initially moved to Paris to attempt a career as a singer, inspired by Belgian artist Jacques Brel, though this endeavor was “quickly forgotten” according to French newspaper Le Parisien¹. By the early 1970s, Vorilhon had established himself as a sports journalist and racing car driver, even participating in races with his Mazda RX 7 Turbo during the 1980s and 1990s². He edited a French sports magazine and seems to have led a relatively conventional life prior to the events of December 1973².

The December 1973 Encounter

According to Vorilhon’s account, on December 13, 1973, he was driving to his office when he felt a sudden impulse to visit an extinct volcano called Puy de Lassolas near Clermont-Ferrand in central southern France²³. This decision, he later claimed, was not spontaneous but the result of telepathic influence from extraterrestrial beings who had been monitoring him².

Upon arriving at the volcanic site, Vorilhon claims to have witnessed a UFO land in the caldera. He described it as a “flying saucer” and reported seeing the craft’s door open³². From the craft emerged what Vorilhon described as a diminutive humanoid being, approximately four feet (1.2 meters) tall³⁴. The entity reportedly had “slightly almond-shaped eyes, black and long hair, and a small black beard,” with “white skin with a slightly greenish tinge”³. Some accounts mention the being was dressed in a green suit².

This being identified itself as an “Eloha” (singular of the Hebrew “Elohim”)⁵. According to Vorilhon, the Eloha informed him that they had been monitoring him and had telepathically drawn him to the site with the intention of appointing him as their messenger on Earth². This first meeting was reportedly brief, after which the craft disappeared².

Subsequent Encounters and Messages

Vorilhon claims he was instructed to return to the same location the following day. He reportedly did so for six consecutive days, during which he received information from the alien being³⁶. The Eloha allegedly instructed Vorilhon to bring a Bible and notebook, wear no metal, and tell no one of their meetings³.

During these encounters, Vorilhon was supposedly informed that the Elohim were not gods but scientifically advanced extraterrestrial beings who had created all life on Earth through genetic engineering approximately 25,000 years ago³⁷. The Eloha allegedly told him that evolution is “a myth” and that life on Earth “did not happen by chance”³. Vorilhon was also apparently told that only certain parts of the Bible were important, specifically those that the alien would translate for him².

According to Vorilhon, on October 7, 1975, he experienced another significant encounter during which he claims the Elohim took him to their home planet⁷⁶. During this visit, he allegedly learned about their society, including their political system and lifestyle, where only the most intelligent were chosen as leaders⁷. He was also reportedly introduced to the “sensual meditation technique,” which later became practiced by his followers⁷.

Foundation of the Raëlian Movement

Following these experiences, Vorilhon adopted the name “Raël,” meaning “messenger of the Elohim” or “light of God”⁴⁷. He established the International Raëlian Movement (IRM) in 1975⁸, which would grow to become what some scholars consider “perhaps the world’s most successful extraterrestrial religion”³.

Vorilhon published his first book, “Le Livre Qui Dit la Vérité” (The Book Which Tells the Truth), in early 1974, detailing his alleged encounters⁷⁸. This was followed by “Les Extra-terrestres M’ont Emmené sur Leur Planète” (Extraterrestrials Took Me to Their Planet) after his claimed second encounter⁷. These works form the scriptural foundation of the Raëlian movement.

Credibility Assessment

Lack of Independent Verification

One of the most significant issues with Vorilhon’s claims is the complete absence of independent verification. The entire account rests solely on Vorilhon’s testimony, with no other witnesses to the alleged encounters, despite occurring over multiple days². No physical evidence of the spacecraft or beings has ever been presented or discovered by others².

Scientific Feasibility

The Raëlian cosmology presents numerous scientific problems. Their creation story contradicts established evolutionary biology and genetic science. While Raëlians claim their beliefs are scientific rather than religious, their rejection of evolution in favor of extraterrestrial creation lacks scientific evidence³. Vorilhon himself has described evolutionists as “false prophets”³.

Consistency and Predictive Power

The Raëlian movement gained significant media attention in the early 2000s when a company they founded, Clonaid, claimed to have successfully cloned a human baby named Eve in December 2002⁹¹⁰. This claim aligned with their belief that cloning could lead to immortality. However, when pressed to provide scientific evidence of the cloning, Clonaid declined to offer proof⁹. Journalist and scientist Michael Guillen, who had assembled a team to verify the claim, stated that he was denied access to both the alleged baby and mother⁹. This episode severely undermined the credibility of Raëlian claims, with Guillen acknowledging that it could have been “absolutely an elaborate hoax”⁹.

Counterarguments and Skepticism

Alternative Explanations

Several alternative explanations exist for Vorilhon’s claims:

1. Deliberate fabrication: Critics suggest Vorilhon may have intentionally created the story to gain fame, followers, or financial support. His previous careers in entertainment and journalism suggest media savvy and an understanding of public relations¹¹.
2. Psychological explanations: Some skeptics propose that Vorilhon may have experienced hallucinations, delusions, or other psychological phenomena that he interpreted as alien contact.
3. Cultural influence: Vorilhon’s account emerged during a period of heightened UFO interest in the 1970s. His narrative bears similarities to other contactee stories and science fiction themes popular during that era⁴.

Religious and Cultural Context

Religious scholars have noted that Raëlism, despite claiming to be scientific rather than religious, essentially reinterprets traditional religious narratives with an extraterrestrial explanation. Historian Eugene Gallagher and scholar Paul Brian Thomas have described Raëlism as “fundamentally a biblical religion”³. The Raëlian interpretation of biblical events—such as claiming Noah’s Ark was a spacecraft, the Tower of Babel was a rocket, and the parting of the Red Sea was accomplished with a “repulsion beam”—suggests a retrofitting of religious narratives rather than a genuine scientific approach⁴.

Media Strategy and Controversy

Susan Palmer, a sociologist of religion who has extensively studied the Raëlian movement, suggests that since the early 1990s, the Raëlians have deliberately launched publicity campaigns “designed to shock, titillate, and capture the media’s imagination”¹². This strategy included provocative campaigns like “Operation Condom” conducted in front of Catholic schools and the Baby Eve cloning announcement. Palmer argues that through these controlled “outrages,” the movement directs its public image and deflects more serious criticisms typically aimed at new religious movements¹².

Influence and Impact

Growth and Scale of the Movement

Despite skepticism about its founding narrative, the Raëlian movement has shown remarkable longevity and growth. The organization claims to have up to 60,000 members worldwide¹², though independent verification of this number is difficult. The movement has spread across continents from its origins in France¹, establishing a hierarchical organization under Vorilhon’s leadership⁸.

Media Portrayal and Public Perception

The Raëlian movement has garnered significant media attention throughout its existence. In France, where the movement originated, Raëlians are particularly infamous and regularly make headlines¹. The French parliament officially classified Raëlism as a cult in 1995¹, reflecting the mainstream perception of the movement in its country of origin.

Media coverage increased dramatically in December 2002 when Clonaid, a company founded by Raël and headed by Brigitte Boisselier, claimed to have created the world’s first human clone¹⁰. This announcement was “met with skepticism, concern and outrage” from scientists, politicians, and religious groups¹⁰. The controversy potentially affected U.S. cloning legislation, with scientists like Robert Lanza from Advanced Cell Technology expressing concern that such unsubstantiated claims could “cause a huge public outcry and a backlash that could cripple” legitimate medical research¹⁰.

In 2024, Netflix released a four-part documentary series titled “Raël: The Alien Prophet,” which features interviews with current and former members, as well as with Vorilhon himself¹⁹. This documentary is likely to introduce the movement to a new audience worldwide and reignite discussion about Vorilhon’s claims.

Impact on UFO Discourse and New Religious Movements

Vorilhon’s 1973 contact claim represents an important case study in how UFO narratives can transform into organized religious movements. Unlike many alleged UFO encounters that remain isolated incidents, Vorilhon’s claim became the foundation for an enduring international organization with specific beliefs, practices, and hierarchical structure.

The Raëlian movement emerged during a period when “UFO sightings markedly increased, as did tales of alien encounters and abductions”⁴. It represents a shift from earlier contactee narratives by incorporating elements of modern scientific discourse, particularly around genetics and cloning. As scholars have noted, Raëlism borrowed from existing religious and occult literature, transforming the Theosophical concept of “ascended masters” into technologically advanced extraterrestrial beings who “descended to earth in spaceships”⁴.

Sources and Follow-up Research

Academic Studies

The Raëlian movement has been studied by numerous scholars of religion and sociology. Susan Palmer has written extensively about the IRM, publishing multiple works examining various aspects of the movement and its development³. George Chryssides has analyzed what he terms Raëlism’s “scientific creationism”³. Eugene Gallagher and Paul Brian Thomas have studied the movement’s relationship to biblical narratives³.

These academic studies provide valuable insight into the development, beliefs, and social dynamics of the Raëlian movement, though they typically focus more on the movement as a new religious phenomenon rather than evaluating the veracity of Vorilhon’s initial contact claims.

Primary Documents

The primary sources for Vorilhon’s claims are his own books: “Le Livre Qui Dit la Vérité” (The Book Which Tells the Truth) and “Les Extra-terrestres M’ont Emmené sur Leur Planète” (Extraterrestrials Took Me to Their Planet)⁷⁸. These texts detail his alleged encounters and the messages he claims to have received from the Elohim.

Additional primary sources include interviews with Vorilhon himself, such as his 1994 interview with French TV host Thierry Ardisson¹. The recent Netflix documentary “Raël: The Alien Prophet” also features direct interviews with Vorilhon and thus serves as another primary source for his claims¹⁹.

Avenues for Further Research

Several aspects of the Vorilhon case merit further investigation:

1. Psychological assessment: A thorough examination of Vorilhon’s psychological state before, during, and after his alleged encounters could provide insight into the nature of his experiences.
2. Comparative analysis: A detailed comparison between Vorilhon’s narrative and other contactee stories from the same period might reveal patterns or sources of influence.
3. Financial investigation: Research into the financial structure and operations of the Raëlian movement could help determine whether economic motives played a role in the development and promotion of Vorilhon’s claims.
4. Geological and geographical verification: Investigation of the physical location where Vorilhon claims to have encountered the UFO, including any unusual geological or electromagnetic features that might contribute to hallucinations or unusual perceptions.
5. Cultural context analysis: Deeper analysis of the French cultural and social context of the early 1970s could illuminate factors that may have influenced Vorilhon’s narrative and its reception.

Conclusion

Claude Vorilhon’s 1973 alien contact claim represents a case where minimal evidence has led to maximum impact. Without physical evidence, independent witnesses, or scientific verification, Vorilhon’s personal testimony became the foundation for an international religious movement that continues nearly five decades later.

From an evidential standpoint, the case is weak, resting entirely on one individual’s claims without corroboration. The subsequent activities of the Raëlian movement, particularly around unverified human cloning claims, have further undermined the credibility of its founder’s original narrative.

However, from a sociological and religious studies perspective, the case is significant. It demonstrates how UFO narratives can evolve into organized religious movements with distinct beliefs, practices, and communities. The longevity and growth of the Raëlian movement, despite widespread skepticism about its founding claims, speaks to the powerful appeal of narratives that combine elements of science, religion, and extraterrestrial contact.

The story of Claude Vorilhon’s alleged 1973 encounter with the Elohim ultimately tells us more about human psychology, religious formation, and media dynamics than it does about extraterrestrial visitation. While believers continue to accept Vorilhon’s account as literal truth, the absence of compelling evidence means that, from a critical perspective, this case remains an interesting sociological phenomenon rather than a substantiated extraterrestrial encounter.

⁂

^{3254761198101211314151617181920212223242526}

1. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/rael-documentary-netflix-claude-vorilhon-b2492207.html ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵ ↩⁶ ↩⁷ ↩⁸

2. https://www.evangelical-times.org/concerning-cults-the-raelian-movement/ ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵ ↩⁶ ↩⁷ ↩⁸ ↩⁹ ↩¹⁰ ↩¹¹ ↩¹²

3. https://www.cdamm.org/articles/international-raelian-movement ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵ ↩⁶ ↩⁷ ↩⁸ ↩⁹ ↩¹⁰ ↩¹¹ ↩¹² ↩¹³ ↩¹⁴ ↩¹⁵ ↩¹⁶

4. https://www.equip.org/articles/descending-masters-a-history-of-the-raelian-movement/ ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵ ↩⁶ ↩⁷

5. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/aliens-adored-raëls-ufo-religion/docview/220551349/se-2 ↩ ↩²

6. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3pI0gvqKktM ↩ ↩² ↩³

7. https://religionmediacentre.org.uk/factsheets/factsheet-the-raelian-movement/ ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵ ↩⁶ ↩⁷ ↩⁸ ↩⁹

8. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raëlism ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵

9. https://www.businessinsider.com/rael-alien-prophet-cult-clone-humans-claude-vorilhon-netflix-docuseries-2024-2 ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵ ↩⁶ ↩⁷

10. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/human-clone-claim-stirs-c/ ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵

11. https://www.skeptic.org.uk/2002/04/rhyme-and-reason-a-rael-expert-takes-a-look-at-the-raelian-movement/ ↩ ↩²

12. https://academic.oup.com/book/3992/chapter/145626360 ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴

13. https://www.rael.org/contact/ ↩

14. https://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/01/03/cf.opinion.rael/ ↩

15. https://www.baptistpress.com/resource-library/news/raelian-cloning-beliefs-illustrate-dangers-of-naturalistic-worldview/ ↩

16. https://sites.pitt.edu/~dash/rael.html ↩

17. https://ubalt.pressbooks.pub/contknowledge/chapter/raelism-community/ ↩

18. https://archivecollections.uea.ac.uk/ag.rae ↩

19. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/religion-and-philosophy/raelism ↩

20. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raël ↩

21. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2003/8/2/sect-chief-deported-from-south-korea ↩

22. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/nr.2000.4.1.86 ↩

23. https://www.cnn.com/2002/HEALTH/12/28/human.cloning/index.html ↩

24. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086/522855 ↩

25. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/nr.2010.14.2.14 ↩

26. https://zenodo.org/records/10581370/files/Reliability_I-11_Palmer.pdf?download=1 ↩