The Cisco Grove UFO Incident (1964): A Detailed Examination of Evidence and Impact

In the fall of 1964, an extraordinary encounter between a hunter and alleged extraterrestrial entities in the Sierra Nevada mountains would become one of the most intriguing yet lesser-known cases in UFO history. The Cisco Grove incident offers a remarkable narrative of alien contact, featuring humanoid beings, a mechanical robot, and a desperate 12-hour battle for survival. This report examines the evidence, assesses witness credibility, considers alternative explanations, and evaluates the case’s lasting impact on UFO discourse.

Historical and Factual Background

Setting and Circumstances

In September 1964, the remote forests near Cisco Grove, California, became the setting for what would be described as one of the most extraordinary UFO encounters in American history. The primary witness was Donald R. Shrum, a 26-year-old employee of Aerojet General Corporation, a company involved in manufacturing missiles for the U.S. military¹.

Shrum had ventured into the Tahoe National Forest for what he anticipated would be a relaxing weekend deer hunting trip with two companions. Armed with a bow and arrows rather than firearms, Shrum’s traditional hunting expedition was about to take an unprecedented turn. As daylight faded, he became separated from his hunting partners in the expansive wilderness¹².

Finding himself alone as darkness enveloped the forest, Shrum made the prudent decision to climb a tree to avoid potential predators and resigned himself to spending the night in this elevated position of relative safety. It was during this vulnerable moment of isolation that Shrum’s ordinary hunting trip allegedly transformed into a 12-hour ordeal that would challenge both his physical endurance and his understanding of reality¹³.

The Encounter Unfolds

According to Shrum’s account, the incident began when he observed lights in the sky that he initially believed might be a search helicopter looking for him. This hope quickly dissolved as he realized the aerial phenomenon exhibited characteristics inconsistent with conventional aircraft³⁴.

What followed, according to Shrum’s testimony, was a prolonged struggle for survival against entities that appeared determined to capture him. Shrum described encountering two types of beings: humanoid entities that appeared to be wearing something resembling “welders’ goggles,” and a mechanical robot-like entity with glowing red eyes³. Throughout the night, these beings allegedly made repeated attempts to subdue or capture Shrum using what he described as a type of knockout gas³².

In his desperate fight to remain free, Shrum reported employing his archery skills, firing arrows at the entities, particularly the robotic one. As the night progressed and his options dwindled, Shrum resorted to tearing pieces from his own clothing, setting them alight with matches to create makeshift torches and smoke screens that seemed to temporarily repel the mysterious beings¹³.

The ordeal reportedly continued until dawn, when the entities and their craft departed. Exhausted, Shrum eventually reunited with his hunting companions and related his extraordinary experience¹.

The Cisco Grove UFO Incident (1964): A Detailed Examination of Evidence and Impact - Full-Text (SVG)

Initial Reporting and Documentation

Due to his employment with a defense contractor, Shrum initially kept his identity confidential when reporting the incident¹. This professional connection to the military-industrial complex may partly explain why this case didn’t receive the same level of immediate public attention as other UFO encounters of the era.

Nevertheless, the incident attracted the attention of serious UFO researchers. Coral Lorenzen of the Aerial Phenomenon Investigation Committee (APRO) reportedly called it “the most spectacular report we have examined”¹. Similarly, Paul Cerny of the Mutual UFO Network (MUFON) conducted an extensive investigation and stated emphatically: “There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that this incident is factual and authentic. I have spent considerable time plus many visits with the main witness, and along with the testimony of the other witnesses, I can rule out any possibility of a hoax”¹.

The case also apparently warranted official investigation. According to one source, “In September 1964, Captain McLeod and Sergeant Barnes were dispatched from Wright-Patterson Air Force base in Ohio. They were sent to investigate a UFO sighting in Northern California”⁴. Wright-Patterson AFB was the headquarters for Project Blue Book, the Air Force’s official UFO investigation program that operated from 1947 to 1969⁵.

Credibility Assessment

Donald Shrum as a Witness

Any evaluation of the Cisco Grove incident must begin with an assessment of Donald Shrum’s credibility as a witness. Several factors appear to support Shrum’s reliability. As an employee of Aerojet General Corporation working as a welder and painter, Shrum held a position of responsibility that would typically require a stable individual with technical skills¹². His employment with a defense contractor suggests he would have passed basic security screening and demonstrated general trustworthiness.

Importantly, Shrum does not appear to have sought publicity or financial gain from his experience, at least not initially. According to available information, he maintained his privacy for many years, with his full identity in connection with the incident only revealed much later with the publication of “Aliens in the Forest: The Cisco Grove UFO Encounter”¹. This reluctance to publicize his experience could potentially indicate sincerity, as hoaxers typically seek immediate attention.

The emotional impact of the event on Shrum appears to have been profound and lasting. According to podcast discussions of the case, the experience affected Shrum for the rest of his life³, suggesting a genuinely traumatic event rather than a fabricated story.

Investigation by UFO Researchers

The credibility of the Cisco Grove incident is enhanced by the serious attention it received from established UFO research organizations of the era. Both APRO and MUFON, the two leading civilian UFO research groups of the time, investigated the case and appeared to find Shrum’s account compelling¹.

Paul Cerny of MUFON, who was known for his methodical approach to UFO investigations, spent considerable time with Shrum and other witnesses (presumably Shrum’s hunting companions), concluding that the case was authentic and not a hoax¹. While UFO researchers naturally approach such cases with interest rather than skepticism, Cerny’s extensive investigation and firm conclusion suggest that Shrum’s account remained consistent under scrutiny and that no obvious contradictions or red flags emerged during the investigation.

Official Investigation

The reported dispatch of Air Force personnel from Wright-Patterson AFB to investigate the incident suggests that official channels took the report seriously enough to warrant in-person investigation⁴. During this period, Project Blue Book was the Air Force’s official mechanism for investigating UFO reports, and Wright-Patterson served as its headquarters⁵⁶.

However, the available information doesn’t provide details about the conclusions reached by these Air Force investigators or whether an official report was filed. The case occurred during a period when the Air Force was actively documenting UFO reports, with Project Blue Book eventually accumulating a total of 12,618 sightings between 1947 and 1969, of which 701 remained classified as “Unidentified” when the project concluded⁵.

Physical Evidence

According to one account, Shrum showed Air Force investigators “one of the arrows that he had fired at the robot creature,” but they apparently dismissed his experience as “likely just some teenagers pulling a prank” and took the arrow, telling him “we’ll throw that Arrow out for you”⁷. If accurate, this would represent a potentially important piece of physical evidence that was not properly preserved or examined.

The absence of other discussions about physical evidence—such as marks on the tree where Shrum took refuge, residue from the alleged knockout gas, or other environmental impacts—represents a significant gap in the case file that limits a comprehensive credibility assessment.

Counterarguments and Skepticism

Psychological Factors and Misperception

One potential explanation centers on the psychological impact of being alone in a wilderness environment at night. Separation from his hunting companions in unfamiliar forest terrain would naturally induce anxiety in Shrum. As darkness fell and he found himself forced to spend the night in a tree, his stress levels would likely have increased significantly.

Under such conditions of stress, isolation, and sensory deprivation (limited visibility in a dark forest), the human mind becomes more susceptible to misinterpreting ambiguous stimuli. Ordinary forest sounds, wildlife movements, or distant lights could potentially be perceived as more threatening or extraordinary than they actually were.

Sleep deprivation would have become an increasingly significant factor as the night progressed, potentially affecting Shrum’s perception and judgment. Periods of microsleep or hypnagogic states (the transitional state between wakefulness and sleep) can produce vivid, dream-like experiences that can be misinterpreted as reality.

The Cisco Grove UFO Incident (1964): A Detailed Examination of Evidence and Impact - P1 (SVG)

Conventional Explanations

The initial light that Shrum observed and interpreted as a potential UFO might have been a conventional aircraft, meteorological phenomenon, or other explainable aerial event. The Sierra Nevada mountain region, with its variable atmospheric conditions, can produce unusual light effects, particularly at night.

The “entities” that Shrum reported could potentially have been wildlife, other humans in the area, or even elaborate shadows created by moonlight through forest foliage. The “robot” with glowing eyes bears some resemblance to how someone might describe a human wearing reflective gear or using lighting equipment in low-visibility conditions.

The “knockout gas” that Shrum reported could potentially have been explained by natural forest mists, his own campfire smoke, or even respiratory effects caused by anxiety-induced hyperventilation.

Cultural Context and Influence

The early to mid-1960s saw significant public interest in space exploration, with the Mercury and Gemini programs actively sending Americans into orbit. Science fiction literature, films, and television shows of the era frequently featured themes of alien encounters and advanced technology. This cultural backdrop could potentially have influenced how Shrum interpreted ambiguous experiences in the forest.

The presence of a robotic entity in Shrum’s account is particularly notable, as it differs from many contemporary UFO encounter reports, which more commonly described only biological entities. This unique detail might either strengthen the case (as it deviates from “typical” UFO narratives of the time) or weaken it (if viewed as an embellishment influenced by science fiction depicting robots).

Influence and Impact

Place in UFO History

The Cisco Grove incident occupies an interesting position in UFO history. Despite being characterized by researchers like Coral Lorenzen as “the most spectacular report we have examined”¹, it has not achieved the same level of public recognition as contemporaneous cases like the Betty and Barney Hill abduction (1961) or the Socorro landing (1964).

This relative obscurity may be partly attributed to Donald Shrum’s initial reluctance to publicly identify himself, given his employment with a defense contractor¹. Without a named witness willing to speak publicly, media coverage would naturally have been limited.

The case occurred during what many UFO researchers consider a significant period of UFO activity in the 1960s, when Project Blue Book was actively investigating reports and public interest in the phenomenon was substantial⁵. The timing places it within a larger context of Cold War-era UFO sightings, many of which involved military or defense-related witnesses.

Enduring Interest in the Case

Despite its initially limited public profile, the Cisco Grove incident has maintained enduring interest within the UFO research community. The publication of “Aliens in the Forest: The Cisco Grove UFO Encounter” by Noe Torres and Ruben Uriarte appears to have brought renewed attention to the case, presenting it as “the first and only fully authorized account ever written about this astonishing UFO incident”¹².

More recently, the case has found new audiences through digital media. Podcasts like “That Would Be Rad” have featured episodes specifically dedicated to the incident³, while YouTube channels have produced content exploring the encounter, such as “Mystery in Cisco Grove: Don Shrum’s Encounter with UFOs, Aliens and Robots” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4yEkCSyTTxg)⁴. This ongoing interest suggests that the Cisco Grove incident continues to resonate with those interested in UFO phenomena.

The case has also been featured on Spotify’s “Theories of the Third Kind” podcast in April 2024, indicating continued relevance in contemporary UFO discourse⁸.

Distinctive Elements

Several aspects of the Cisco Grove incident make it distinctive within UFO literature. The prolonged duration of the encounter (approximately 12 hours) is unusual, as many reported UFO encounters are much briefer. The combination of humanoid entities working alongside a robotic being represents a somewhat unique narrative within UFO accounts of that era.

Perhaps most notably, Shrum’s active resistance against the alleged abduction attempt—using his bow and arrows and setting fire to his clothing—presents a narrative of human agency and resistance that differs from many abduction accounts where witnesses report being rendered passive or immobile.

These distinctive elements may contribute to the case’s enduring interest among UFO researchers and enthusiasts, as it presents a scenario that doesn’t neatly fit into the typical patterns of reported encounters from that period.

Sources and Follow-up Research

Key Sources

The primary source for information about the Cisco Grove incident is Donald Shrum himself, whose firsthand account forms the foundation for all subsequent discussions of the case. The book “Aliens in the Forest: The Cisco Grove UFO Encounter” by Noe Torres and Ruben Uriarte, created “with the full cooperation and permission of Mr. Donald R. Shrum, the key eyewitness, his wife Judi, and their son Dan”¹, appears to present the most comprehensive version of Shrum’s testimony.

The investigations conducted by Paul Cerny of MUFON and potentially those of Coral Lorenzen of APRO would constitute valuable primary research on the case. However, specific information about where these investigation reports might be accessed or whether they are publicly available is not readily apparent.

The apparent Air Force investigation by personnel from Wright-Patterson AFB represents another potentially significant source of information. If reports from this investigation exist, they might be accessible through Freedom of Information Act requests or possibly within the declassified Project Blue Book archives maintained by the National Archives⁵.

Gaps in the Evidence

Several significant gaps in the available evidence limit a comprehensive assessment of the Cisco Grove incident:

There is limited clarity about whether the case was officially included in Project Blue Book records or what conclusions official investigators reached.
Information about corroborating testimony from Shrum’s hunting companions who were with him on the trip before and after the alleged encounter is sparse.
There is little mention of whether any physical evidence was properly collected, preserved, and analyzed, such as the arrow Shrum allegedly fired at the robotic entity.
Medical or psychological evaluations of Shrum following the incident, which might have provided insights into his physical and mental state, are not referenced in available sources.
There is no mention of whether any environmental analysis was conducted at the site to search for physical traces or anomalies.

The Cisco Grove UFO Incident (1964): A Detailed Examination of Evidence and Impact - P2 (SVG)

Avenues for Follow-up Research

To address these gaps and develop a more complete understanding of the Cisco Grove incident, several avenues for follow-up research present themselves:

A comprehensive review of the Project Blue Book archives, which have been declassified and transferred to the National Archives⁵, to determine whether the Cisco Grove incident was officially documented and what conclusions military investigators might have reached.
Locating and interviewing Shrum’s hunting companions who were with him on the trip, if they are still living, to corroborate elements of his account and provide additional context.
On-site investigation of the location where the incident allegedly occurred, using modern detection equipment to search for any residual physical evidence, though the passage of time would make this increasingly challenging.
Review of local newspaper archives from September 1964 to determine whether the incident received contemporary media coverage and how it was reported at the time.
Examination of any records from APRO or MUFON that might contain more detailed information about their investigations of the case, including any interviews with Shrum or physical evidence they may have documented.
Analysis of weather conditions, aircraft flight patterns, and military exercises in the area during September 1964, which might identify conventional explanations for some aspects of the reported experience.

Conclusion

The Cisco Grove incident of 1964 represents an intriguing case in UFO history that continues to generate discussion and analysis decades after the event. Donald Shrum’s account of a prolonged encounter with unknown entities in the California wilderness presents elements that are both consistent with other reported UFO encounters of the era and uniquely distinctive in important ways.

The case benefits from the credibility of its primary witness—a professional employed by a defense contractor who did not immediately seek publicity—and from the serious attention it received from established UFO research organizations. Paul Cerny’s unequivocal statement that “there is absolutely no doubt in my mind that this incident is factual and authentic”¹ represents a strong endorsement from a respected investigator who spent considerable time examining the case.

However, a critical analysis must acknowledge the limitations in the available evidence. The apparent absence of well-documented physical evidence, clear official conclusions, or extensive contemporary media coverage creates significant challenges for definitive assessment. The psychological and perceptual factors that might influence anyone’s experience during a night alone in a forest cannot be dismissed, nor can the broader cultural context of the space age and its influence on how unusual experiences might be interpreted.

What makes the Cisco Grove incident particularly valuable within UFO discourse is its potential to illuminate the complexities of human perception, memory, and interpretation of anomalous experiences. Whether one interprets Shrum’s account as evidence of extraterrestrial visitation or as a case study in how ordinary events can be perceived as extraordinary under certain conditions, the detailed nature of his testimony and its investigation provides rich material for analysis.

The case reminds us that the most interesting UFO reports often come not from sensationalized tabloid accounts but from ordinary individuals who report extraordinary experiences that profoundly affect their understanding of reality. Donald Shrum’s 12-hour ordeal in the forests of Cisco Grove—whether literally as reported or filtered through the lens of human perception—clearly represented such a life-changing event.

As with many compelling UFO cases, the Cisco Grove incident resists simple classification or dismissal. It remains one of those thought-provoking encounters that occupies the uncertain territory between the known and the unknown, challenging us to consider the limitations of our understanding and the vast possibilities that might exist beyond our current knowledge.

⁂

¹³²⁵⁴⁹¹⁰⁶¹¹⁷¹²⁸¹³¹⁴¹⁵¹⁶¹⁷¹⁸¹⁹

Isaac Koi