Isaac Koi

This website was the first generated by my self-improving AI system (Skynet), to summarise the top 100 UFO cases.

The Belgian UFO wave of 1989-1990 stands as one of the most significant and extensively documented series of UFO sightings in modern history. Over a period of approximately five months, thousands of witnesses reported observing triangular-shaped unidentified flying objects across Belgian skies, with the most compelling incidents involving radar tracking and fighter jet pursuits. What elevates this case above typical UFO reports is the unprecedented level of official government and military investigation, extensive radar data, and the sheer volume of consistent witness testimony.

Historical and Factual Background

The Initial Wave: November-December 1989

The Belgian UFO wave began on November 29, 1989, when at least 30 different groups of witnesses, including three separate groups of police officers (totaling 143 witnesses), reported seeing unusual aerial phenomena in the skies over Belgium12. The initial sighting involved two gendarmes in Eupen who observed what they described as a large triangular object flying at low altitude, marked with three bright lights at its corners and exhibiting completely silent flight2.

These triangular craft were reported to hover silently in the Eupen area and over Lake Gileppe, with some witnesses claiming they were seen near the nuclear power plant in Thiange1. What made these early reports particularly compelling was the consistency in descriptions from witnesses separated by considerable distances with no prior contact with each other1. Some witnesses even described observing what they characterized as a “mothership” resembling “an upside-down aircraft carrier”1.

On December 11-12, 1989, another series of significant sightings occurred in the regions around Liège and Namur. In one particularly unusual incident, a man in Jupille-sur-Meuse reportedly awoke around 2 AM to a deep, pulsating sound and observed an egg-shaped object that appeared to be stuck in a spruce-fir tree. This object allegedly had three bright spotlights underneath and something resembling a rudder at the back, with a logo on the hull reminiscent of symbols depicting electron orbits3.

By December 21, 1989, the phenomenon had garnered sufficient attention that the Belgian Minister of Defense issued an official statement acknowledging the reports and admitting that the Army had no explanation for what citizens were witnessing in the skies3.

The F-16 Intercept: March 30-31, 1990

The most scientifically significant event of the Belgian UFO wave occurred on the night of March 30, 1990. At approximately 23:00, the supervisor for the Control Reporting Center (CRC) at Glons received reports of three unusual lights moving toward Thorembais-Gembloux, southeast of Brussels4. The Glons CRC requested the Wavre gendarmerie send a patrol to confirm the sighting4.

According to the official narrative, the Traffic Center Control at Semmerzake tracked an unidentified object on its radar, prompting the scrambling of two F-16 fighters from Beauvechain Air Base45. This radar tracking was reportedly confirmed by multiple ground stations, including a NATO-controlled facility near Glons5. The object allegedly failed to transmit the expected transponder signal that would identify it as a conventional aircraft5.

Over the following hour, the two scrambled F-16s attempted nine separate interceptions of the radar targets6. On three occasions, they briefly achieved radar lock, but subsequent analysis revealed these were likely locks on each other rather than on an unknown object6. Importantly, neither pilot reported visually observing any unusual lights or aircraft during the pursuit, and they were unable to maintain consistent radar contact with anything other than each other6.

After 12:30 AM, radar contacts became sporadic, with the last confirmed contact recorded at 12:40 AM. The F-16s returned to their base shortly after 1:00 AM6. Curiously, no civilian reports were received on the actual date of this incident. However, over the subsequent two weeks, 143 people came forward claiming to have witnessed the events of that night46.

The Belgian UFO Wave (1989-1990): A Critical Analysis of Radar and Visual Evidence - Full-Text (SVG)

The Broader Wave

Between November 1989 and April 1990, Belgian authorities documented over 2,000 reports of unidentified flying objects78. These reports came from civilians, police officers, and military personnel across the country. The consistency in descriptions—primarily large triangular craft with lights at each corner and silent operation—contributed to the credibility of the wave as a genuine phenomenon rather than isolated misidentifications or hoaxes.

Credibility Assessment

Military and Official Involvement

The Belgian UFO wave stands apart from many UFO cases due to the transparent and cooperative approach taken by Belgian military officials. Major-General Wilfried De Brouwer, then Chief of Operations of the Belgian Air Staff, became a key figure in the investigation17. Rather than dismissing the reports, De Brouwer initially hypothesized that the objects might be advanced experimental American aircraft being tested over Belgian airspace7. This pragmatic approach lent significant credibility to the case.

The Belgian government took the unprecedented step of collaborating with civilian UFO researchers, forming a special task force known as SOBEPS (Société Belge d’Étude des Phénomènes Spatiaux) to investigate the wave8. This organization included scientists, military personnel, and civilian researchers who collected witness testimonies, analyzed radar data, and studied photographic evidence8. In 1991, SOBEPS published a comprehensive report documenting over 1,000 UFO sightings, concluding that the observations were genuine and could not be readily explained by conventional aircraft, natural phenomena, or hoaxes8.

Radar Evidence

The radar evidence from the March 30, 1990 incident has been both a cornerstone of believers’ arguments and a target for skeptical analysis. According to military reports, multiple radar stations simultaneously tracked unidentified objects45. The Belgian Air Force released data detailing the flight paths, speeds, and acceleration of these objects, with some analyses suggesting the craft exhibited accelerations of up to 46g—far beyond the capabilities of conventional aircraft and the physiological limits of human pilots9.

However, subsequent analysis of the radar tapes by scientists, military experts, and skeptics suggested that the unusual radar returns might have been caused by anomalous atmospheric conditions rather than physical objects3. The fact that F-16 pilots achieved only brief radar locks that couldn’t be maintained, and never visually confirmed any unusual objects despite advanced targeting systems, weakens the radar evidence considerably6.

Witness Testimony

The Belgian UFO wave involved thousands of witnesses, including military personnel, police officers, and civilians from diverse backgrounds1108. The consistency in their descriptions of triangular craft with lights at the corners lends credibility to the idea that something unusual was observed in Belgian skies during this period.

However, critical examination reveals important limitations in this testimony. For the pivotal March 30 intercept incident, no witnesses reported observations on the actual day—all reports came days or weeks after the event had been publicized46. This pattern raises questions about the reliability of these accounts and the potential for suggestibility and confirmation bias in witness recollections.

Counterarguments and Skepticism

The Photographic Hoax

One of the most damaging blows to the credibility of the Belgian UFO wave came in 2011, when a man identified only as “Patrick” confessed that the famous triangular UFO photograph that had puzzled experts for years was actually a hoax11. He revealed on Belgian television network RTL-TVI that he and some friends had constructed a model out of polystyrene in a matter of hours, painted it, hung it up, and photographed it11. This photograph, which showed a black triangle with bright lights at each corner, had been widely published and became the iconic image of the Belgian wave11.

“It’s too easy to fool people, even with a cheap model,” Patrick stated, explaining that he had decided it was time to come clean after more than two decades11. This revelation undermined a crucial piece of physical evidence that UFO researchers had cited for years.

Conventional Aircraft and Misidentification

Skeptics have proposed that many of the sightings could have been misidentifications of conventional aircraft. The configuration of three white lights and a red flashing light described in many reports is consistent with standard lighting configurations for aircraft3. The Belgian Air Force and skeptical researchers considered the possibility that advanced stealth aircraft, particularly the F-117 Nighthawk, might have been conducting unauthorized test flights over Belgian territory123.

Wikipedia notes that the triangular UFOs reported in Belgium between 1989-1990 “were suspected to be a stealth F-117 using the Belgian highways as a flight path”12. This explanation would account for the unusual appearance and flight characteristics reported by witnesses.

However, critics of this theory point out that stealth aircraft are designed for speed, not for hovering close to the ground, making sharp turns, and producing only a soft humming sound, as was described in many witness accounts3. Additionally, there has never been any official confirmation of secret U.S. military operations in Belgian airspace during this period.

The Belgian UFO Wave (1989-1990): A Critical Analysis of Radar and Visual Evidence - P1 (SVG)

The Blimp Hypothesis

Some investigators proposed that many sightings could be explained by teleguided blimps equipped with bright spotlights and cameras3. This theory gained traction when researchers discovered that such devices had indeed been tested in Belgium in late 19893.

The owner of these craft was reportedly “an eccentric Hungarian” who rented his contraptions for publicity purposes and hoped to secure military contracts. According to reports, this individual contacted Major-General De Brouwer and Belgian intelligence services, claiming responsibility for starting the UFO wave and offering to prove it in exchange for a substantial sum of money3. Both the Air Force and intelligence services dismissed this claim, and the inventor later denied ever flying his radio-controlled balloons outdoors, creating further confusion3.

Radar and Atmospheric Anomalies

The radar evidence from the March 30 incident, while initially compelling, has been subject to significant skeptical scrutiny. Analysis of the radar tapes suggested that the unusual returns might have been caused by atmospheric phenomena rather than solid objects3. The F-16 pilots’ inability to maintain radar lock or visually confirm any targets supports this interpretation6.

Meteorological conditions can create radar anomalies that mimic solid objects, including temperature inversions, precipitation, and unusual atmospheric ducting effects. These natural phenomena could explain the radar tracks without requiring the presence of unconventional aircraft.

Mass Suggestion and Media Influence

The pattern of witness reports emerging after media coverage rather than before raises questions about the role of suggestion and expectation in shaping perceptions. Skeptical physicist Brian Dunning noted on his Skeptoid podcast the curious disconnect between the claimed massive proportions of the event and the relatively limited contemporary notice taken of it2. This observation suggests that the Belgian UFO wave may have grown in the retelling, with later accounts influenced by media coverage and the reports of others.

Influence and Impact

Government Policy and Investigation

The Belgian UFO wave established a precedent for open, transparent government investigation of UFO phenomena. Unlike the secretive approach often taken by other nations, Belgian authorities opted for collaboration with civilian researchers and publicly acknowledged the limitations of their understanding8. This cooperative model influenced subsequent approaches to UFO investigation internationally.

The Belgian government’s creation of SOBEPS as a special task force demonstrated an unprecedented level of official engagement with the UFO phenomenon8. This approach contrasts sharply with the dismissive or secretive stances often adopted by other governments when confronted with similar reports.

Transformation of UFO Imagery

The Belgian wave significantly transformed the popular conception of UFOs from the classic flying saucer to the dark triangular craft3. This shift in imagery has persisted in UFO reports worldwide in the decades since, with triangular craft becoming one of the most commonly reported UFO configurations.

As noted by researchers, the Belgian UFO was instrumental in “transforming the traditional nuts-and-bolts image of the flying saucer into a new high-tech UFO that pops up almost exclusively at night, looks like a dark, angular structure and carries a panoply of multicolored lights”3.

Continued Sightings and Research

More than three decades after the original wave, Belgium continues to experience significant UFO activity. In 2018, Belgium recorded 255 UFO reports, a substantial increase from the 171 reported in 201713. This ongoing phenomenon suggests either a continuing presence of unusual aerial objects or a persistent cultural context that frames ambiguous aerial observations as potential UFO sightings.

The Belgian UFO wave remains a compelling case study for researchers and has prompted discussions about international cooperation in studying unidentified aerial phenomena8. The extensive documentation and official involvement make it a reference point for serious UFO research, even as debate continues about the nature and explanation of the original sightings.

Sources and Follow-up Research

Primary Documents and Expert Opinions

Several key sources have documented and analyzed the Belgian UFO wave:

  • Belgian Air Force reports detailing the events of March 30, 1990, including radar data and F-16 pursuit logs45
  • The comprehensive SOBEPS report published in 1991, documenting over 1,000 UFO sightings8
  • Leslie Kean’s book “UFOs: Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials Go On The Record,” which includes detailed accounts of the Belgian wave1
  • The testimony of Major-General Wilfried De Brouwer, whose involvement lent significant credibility to the investigation17

The YouTube video “They’re playing games with our aircraft” features a rare interview with a Belgian F-16 fighter jet pilot concerning the chase of the triangular UFO in 1990, providing firsthand testimony from military personnel involved in the intercept attempts14.

Gaps in Evidence and Suggestions for Further Research

Despite extensive investigation, significant gaps remain in our understanding of the Belgian UFO wave:

  1. Pilot Testimony: More comprehensive interviews with the F-16 pilots involved in the March 30, 1990 incident could provide crucial insights into what they experienced and observed during their pursuit of the radar targets.
  2. Meteorological Analysis: A detailed retroactive analysis of atmospheric conditions during key sighting periods could help evaluate the plausibility of weather-related explanations for both visual sightings and radar anomalies.
  3. U.S. Military Records: Freedom of Information Act requests for U.S. military records pertaining to any operations or test flights over Belgium during 1989-1990 could help confirm or refute the experimental aircraft hypothesis.
  4. The Hungarian Inventor: Further investigation into the claims of the Hungarian inventor who asserted that his teleguided blimps were responsible for initiating the wave could potentially resolve a key alternative explanation3.
  5. Witness Psychology: Research into why no witnesses reported the March 30 F-16 incident on the day it occurred, with all reports coming after media coverage, could illuminate the role of suggestion and expectation in UFO sightings.

Conclusion

The Belgian UFO wave of 1989-1990 remains one of the most extensively documented and officially investigated UFO cases in history. The combination of thousands of consistent witness reports, radar tracking, military intercept attempts, and government investigation gives it substantial weight in the annals of UFO research.

However, critical analysis reveals significant weaknesses in the evidence. The confession that the iconic photograph was a hoax undermines a key piece of physical evidence. The pattern of witness reports emerging after rather than before media coverage raises questions about reliability. The radar evidence, while initially compelling, has alternative explanations in atmospheric phenomena, and the failure of F-16 pilots to visually confirm any unusual objects despite advanced targeting systems further weakens the case for extraordinary aircraft.

The truth likely lies somewhere between the extremes of fully extraterrestrial visitation and complete dismissal as misidentification or hoax. The Belgian wave may represent a complex interplay of genuine unusual phenomena (whether natural, military, or other), perceptual effects, media influence, and social dynamics. Its lasting legacy is not only in the continued debate about what was seen in Belgian skies but also in establishing new methodologies for government-civilian cooperation in investigating unexplained aerial phenomena.

What makes the Belgian UFO wave worthy of continued study is precisely this complexity—it serves as a case study in how multiple lines of evidence can simultaneously support and undermine extraordinary claims, challenging us to maintain rigorous standards of evidence while remaining open to phenomena that defy conventional explanation.

⁂

The Belgian UFO Wave (1989-1990): A Critical Analysis of Radar and Visual Evidence - P2 (SVG)

1102131412113469155781617181920212223242526272829303132

  1. https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10pienf/belgian_ufo_wave_19891990_imagine_authenticity/ ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7 ↩8 ↩9

  2. https://skeptoid.com/episodes/4538 ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  3. https://occult-world.com/belgian-ufo-wave-1989-90/ ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7 ↩8 ↩9 ↩10 ↩11 ↩12 ↩13 ↩14 ↩15

  4. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belgian_UFO_wave ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7 ↩8

  5. https://www.usufocenter.com/ufologist/booth/belgium-UFO-triangle.html ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6

  6. https://area51aliencenter.net/historical-events/belgian-ufo-sightings-part-1/ ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7 ↩8 ↩9

  7. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RuFsvd72nDw ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  8. https://vocal.media/history/the-belgian-ufo-wave ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7 ↩8 ↩9 ↩10

  9. https://vocal.media/futurism/belgian-ufo-wave-of-the-1990s ↩ ↩2

  10. https://unsolved.com/gallery/belgian-ufo/ ↩ ↩2

  11. https://phys.org/news/2011-07-belgium-ufo-puzzled-nasa-polystyrene.html ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  12. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UFO_sightings_in_Belgium ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  13. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/03/ufo-sightings-belgium-rocket/ ↩ ↩2

  14. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Imx0GaA7yUs ↩ ↩2

  15. https://www.politico.eu/article/scepticism-set-to-scupper-any-chance-of-union-led-ufo-research/ ↩

  16. https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/rmz292/ret_belgian_air_force_major_general_wilfried_de/ ↩

  17. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3S0sxE7KEKs ↩

  18. https://tv.apple.com/us/episode/the-ufo-whistleblower/umc.cmc.158m38j5nu44emyiddmvcabzy ↩

  19. https://science.howstuffworks.com/space/aliens-ufos/the-10-most-legitimate-cases-of-u-f-o-sightings.htm ↩

  20. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/publications/divers/2025/0088/EP-PE_DV(2025)0088_XL.pdf ↩

  21. https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ufo_briefingdocument/1990.htm ↩

  22. https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Written-Testimony-Shellenberger.pdf ↩

  23. https://www.reuters.com/article/lifestyle/belgian-hit-ufo-image-was-polystyrene-says-forger-idUSTRE76Q2DE/ ↩

  24. https://media.nationalarchives.gov.uk/index.php/cold-war-ufos/ ↩

  25. https://archive.org/details/belgian-ufo-wave-reportage-belgische-ufologen-1995-by-belgian-ufo-tv ↩

  26. https://www.ufoinsight.com/ufos/waves/belgian-ufo-wave ↩

  27. https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-belgian-ufo-wave-case-file-349/id1048830863?i=1000690774803\&l=fr-FR ↩

  28. https://documents.theblackvault.com/documents/ufos/UK/defe-31-184-1.pdf ↩

  29. https://www.reddit.com/r/aliens/comments/mz2svw/ufo_wave_in_belgium_1990_see_comments/ ↩

  30. https://www.cobeps.org/pdf/belgian_wave_130310.pdf ↩

  31. https://businessdoceurope.com/connext-series-project-the-mysterious-case-of-the-belgian-triangle-by-bram-conjaerts/ ↩

  32. https://theweek.com/articles/905215/30-years-later-still-dont-know-what-really-happened-during-belgian-ufo-wave ↩